tree 59b9057861dde33c4a0497f58ea6553c8d184956
parent 2a2a7005e242469734d8d0d110f4bb657bb67759
author Ivan Fraixedes <ivan@fraixed.es> 1464180447 +0000
committer Ivan Fraixedes <ivan@fraixed.es> 1464180447 +0000
gpgsig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJXRaHcAAoJEAQrR0WX+W23/98IALWlvM15XbrqPTMrb/aJnqi4
 Td89jJjZ1acNqBYT2TEi4ZvkiPuYEk8HjRffnLrlbEn2ksG9qiMv6jCbw7Ojakv8
 OQR8xyqW/8cCb/PHqbt3DXpvATjxVaem2b6M3qa4SYIP2xnH97e5U4Nec0KK7yJH
 lSGzzwdcghUCENmVvVi6RqHQYTmkLSiluD+TdEHhMqbOKG9T0VlM5H9Hn0U5Q9fg
 DFjtVNUydfqmnB7lv3P7EUHnZjrYdoc7q3fjOVIN+d5KV4lL6HHGN8ARGSxy5mMh
 voOgv8iV/YhSxJ83b5cwwIjHYuDwNyUBep+qcr+j9UzGr2q2H2WCwi7QdO5L/M4=
 =ecBv
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Fix method equality to be able to validate a JWT

Fix method equality for being abile to validate a JWT parsed from JWS
token.
Comparing the two SigningMethod interfaces produce false negative for
the most of the cases where a token is received over th wire and it has
to be parsed to JWT from a JWS as so far there isn't any other way; the
equality fails because the types which implements the interface are
defined on pointers, hence they cannot be assigned to type values and do
a comparison over the values, and the addresses never will be the same
because the one assigned to the internal field of the JWS values is one
that it's not exposed, so a new one SigningMethod (pointer) must be
provided to the `Validate`, provoking that the condition always fails